Author Topic: 500W LPF  (Read 3306 times)

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2025, 02:29:31 am »
write all on pcb

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2025, 07:09:53 am »
Thank you Guys.

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #17 on: November 28, 2025, 06:59:03 am »
Guys could i use , Cu wire copper of 1.5mm , just i want to use if it work at max of 80W , 100W .
Thanks.

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2025, 09:17:28 pm »
Guys could i use , Cu wire copper of 1.5mm , just i want to use if it work at max of 80W , 100W .
Thanks.
in that case you need inductance  recalculation,   if remeber 98nH in out, midddle 108nH

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #19 on: November 29, 2025, 07:54:53 am »
Guys could i use , Cu wire copper of 1.5mm , just i want to use if it work at max of 80W , 100W .
Thanks.
in that case you need inductance  recalculation,   if remeber 98nH in out, midddle 108nH

Thank you rigmo , i will see what i have , when i finish it .It could took some time .

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
  • Location: 3rd rock from the sun

  • Badges: (View All)
    Third year Anniversary Karma 50 Posts
Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #20 on: November 29, 2025, 07:59:49 am »
Guys could i use , Cu wire copper of 1.5mm , just i want to use if it work at max of 80W , 100W .
Thanks.

At the power levels you’re using the gauge wire you intend to use will probably work, however it’s worth considering the RF skin effect at the intended operating frequency, the large of the diameter wire the more efficient the LPF will be and having a lower insertion lose. 
Give me a AM transmitter with things that glow any day.

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2025, 03:52:04 pm »
Hi here,

Am a new user.

The disadvantage of a double-side printed circuit under the tracks is that you more insertion losses and what is forget here, is that the total capacity also increases.
Of course you should not mount this PCB flat on the metal but a little bit above it.

I have the best experience with "floating" filters with the coils is separate (with shielding).
If you don't do that, the harmonics will (happily) blow over.

Without special (high price) measuring equipment (Vector Network Analyzer) you actually have no idea what you are doing.

Marcel

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2025, 10:57:39 pm »
Hi here,

Am a new user.

The disadvantage of a double-side printed circuit under the tracks is that you more insertion losses and what is forget here, is that the total capacity also increases.
Of course you should not mount this PCB flat on the metal but a little bit above it.

I have the best experience with "floating" filters with the coils is separate (with shielding).
If you don't do that, the harmonics will (happily) blow over.

Without special (high price) measuring equipment (Vector Network Analyzer) you actually have no idea what you are doing.

Marcel

YES sure. that is reason why orginal not heave coper under coil soldering points!  nanoVNA doig this job very vell
« Last Edit: November 30, 2025, 10:58:52 pm by RIGMO »

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #23 on: December 26, 2025, 03:58:54 pm »
Hi,

It's quite difficult to achieve the following with an open construction on the printed circuit board.
I've tried everything but 'floating with shielding between the coils work best.

See attached photos which only consists of 3 coils ans 4 capacitors.

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2025, 09:39:12 am »
Hello guys mery christmas and happy new years 2026.

i am on making etching one to use with a 100w amplifier .i will post pictures later of construction. i used the blue capacitor of 1kv rating , i know they were not good for high rf power , but it can work on 100w erp.

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2025, 10:09:34 am »
Use ceramic tube capacitors of at least 500V.

I used these up to about 200W without any problems.
These did have slightly higher losses than silver-plated(Semco)capacitors or ATC type 100B.

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2025, 06:29:35 am »
Marcel thank you , for reply .At the moment in hand i only have this type .in early time i used to use some philips quality ceramic , wich no more here where i am . or i have to make my own , but if thoses do the job at the moment that will be good fr such power , i dont need more RF.
Happy new year .

Re: 500W LPF
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2026, 09:24:22 pm »
That's quite similar to the ones we make, but we put screens between the coils.  I compared the filters with and without the screens, and the improvement in the higher harmonic products was significant with the screens in place.

The best filters we use (for higher power gear) use coax lines as resonant stubs, tweaked accurately for the frequency in use.  The higher power gear always uses pairs of output devices, which has the advantage of tending to null even harmonics.  The normally predominant 2f harmonic is several dB lower than the 3f before filtering if the PA is accurately balanced!  This has the advantage of reducing the stringency of the filters needed, especially for the lower harmonic products.

With a conventional filter like the one Zozo shows above, it's crucial to have really low impedance earthing and make sure that the PA is accurately impedance-matched to the filter to minimise losses and to minimise heating problems.  It's interesting to play with the "sense" of the windings - you can get a couple of extra dB of harmonic suppression by winding the first coil clockwise, the next anticlockwise, and so on.  The improvement is marginal but reducing the mutual coupling between coils helps a little.